The text suggests that the legislation requiring environmental impact statements, or EISs, passed by overwhelming majorities because it was a "pro-environment law" and because
a. there was no requirement for specific action, only the need to create a "statement."
b. there was a general sense that EISs would speed up governmental projects.
c. courts would not consider legal challenges to EISs.
d. opponents of projects would be silenced by EISs.
e. federal agencies lobbied Congress intensely for EISs.
Answer: A
If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box. If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box.